Safety of Journalists
In co-operation with UNESCO

UNESCO is the lead UN Agency for promoting freedom of expression and safety of journalists as part of its mandate to “promote the free flow of ideas by word and image”.

← Back to index

Italy

Europe

Understanding Journalist Safety in Italy

Sergio Splendore (Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy), Diego Garusi (Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy)

Overall, if we analyse dimension by dimension, the Italian scores are high and satisfactory. As can be seen from the four indices that make up this ranking, the one in which Italian journalism has the lowest rank is the financial one. On ‘physical’ safety, compared to high scores for other Mediterranean countries (Spain and Portugal), Italy has a relatively low rank, which can have various and multiple explanations (from work on organised crime, to investigative work in the loal environments, even ‘simple’ coverage of events). Overall, this score marks the perception of a safety that is considered satisfactory by Italian journalists. The score achieved with respect to the index relating to ‘psychological safety’ is very much linked to economic precariousness, commented on here at the end of the paragraph. One of the most interesting data, because it has never been investigated before, is certainly that relating to ‘digital safety’. Here, too, the result is very high. Italian journalists generally feel safe from online threats. Probably the care that journalists personally put into their online work and the guidelines of the newspapers shelter them. Coming to the financial index, in the face of an evident variety and liveliness in the supply of information in Italy, new companies do not always have economic solidity (which reverberates on journalists). The sense of precariousness is also felt by journalists working in legacy media. Speeches about the ‘crisis’ in journalism are not just rhetoric, but are evidently felt in the daily lives of those who work in journalism.

Safety Dimensions

This radar chart displays how the country performs across all four safety dimensions, revealing areas of strength and concern.

Gender Safety Gap

This comparison highlights differences in safety experiences between male and female journalists, revealing potential gender-based disparities.

Physical Safety

The physical dimension carries 50% weight in the safety index. Read the methodology in full.

Journalist Killings (35% weight in physical dimension)

2016-2024

This figure represents the total number of journalist killings in Italy between 2016 and 2024.

Data sourced from UNESCO Observatory of Killed Journalists.

Note: This indicator carries 35% of the weight within the physical dimension of the Safety Index, making it the most significant factor in this category.

Responses to: "I am concerned about my physical wellbeing" (20% weight in physical dimension)

Responses to: "In the last five years, how often have you experienced any of the following actions related to your work as a journalist?"

Arrests, detentions or imprisonment (15% weight in physical dimension)

Sexual assault or sexual harassment (15% weight in physical dimension)

Other physical attacks (15% weight in physical dimension)

Abductions (did not contribute to calculation)

Office raids or seizures or damage of equipment (did not contribute to calculation)

Being required to work in an environment where COVID-19 had easily spread (did not contribute to calculation)

Psychological Safety

The psychological dimension carries 25% weight in the safety index. Read the methodology in full.

Responses to: "I am concerned about my emotional wellbeing" (20% weight in psychological dimension)

Responses to: "In the last five years, how often have you experienced any of the following actions related to your work as a journalist?"

Demeaning or hateful speech directed at you (16% weight in psychological dimension)

Public discrediting of your work (16% weight in psychological dimension)

Legal actions against you because of your work (16% weight in psychological dimension)

Stalking (16% weight in psychological dimension)

Other threats or intimidation directed at you (16% weight in psychological dimension)

Coercion (did not contribute to calculation)

Questioning of your personal morality (did not contribute to calculation)

Workplace bullying (did not contribute to calculation)

Intimidation that targets your family or close associates (did not contribute to calculation)

Digital Safety

The digital dimension carries 12.5% weight in the safety index. Read the methodology in full.

Responses to: "In the last five years, how often have you experienced any of the following actions related to your work as a journalist?"

Surveillance (50% weight in digital dimension)

Hacking or blocking of social media accounts or websites (50% weight in digital dimension)

Others using your byline for fabricated or manipulated stories (did not contribute to calculation)

Others disseminating your personal information (did not contribute to calculation)

Financial Safety

The financial dimension carries 12.5% weight in the safety index. Read the methodology in full.

Responses to: "I am worried about losing my job in journalism within the next 12 months" (20% weight in financial dimension)

Responses to: "Which of the following categories best describes your current working situation as a journalist?" (20% weight in financial dimension)

Responses to "Approximately what percentage of your overall work-related income comes from your work as a journalist?" (20% weight in financial dimension)

Responses to: "How many hours a week on average do you work as a journalist?" (20% weight in financial dimension)

Responses to: "In which of the following categories does your salary as a journalist fall?" (20% weight in financial dimension)

Options are given on a 10-point scale specific to each country.

Demographics

This section contains demographic information about survey respondents from Italy.

Coming soon

Demographic information about survey respondents will be available in a future update.