Serbia’s ranking in the latest journalists’ safety index underscores persistent threats to press freedom against the backdrop of the weak rule of law, media capture and hostility towards critical reporting perpetuated by elected officials. While there were no killed journalists in recent years, this five-year scope excludes the three unresolved murders dating back to 1994, 1999, and 2008 - Dada Vujasinovic, Slavko Curuvija, Milan Pantic respectively. In February 2024 the Appellate Court acquitted the four suspects for the Curuvija murder, marking another step in the backslide of journalist safety. This continued impunity has to date a profound chilling effect: journalists report that this lack of justice—not just physical or financial insecurity—is their greatest concern.
In 2024, prosecutors opened 62 cases related to journalist safety, yet only one conviction followed. In over half of these cases, police failed to respond to requests for information, a pattern also seen in previous years. Out of 587 cases opened in the past eight years, 40% remain unresolved. Courts have allowed suspects to await trial under house arrest, and in at least two cases, those individuals escaped. Verbal attacks by top political leaders and pro-government media—branding critical journalists as “imbeciles” or “enemies of the people”—add further intimidation. Such generalised targeting often goes unreported as personal abuse, yet contributes significantly to the overall climate of fear. The rise in SLAPP lawsuits is straining media outlets’ resources, posing an indirect yet powerful financial threat.
Attacks against journalists are documented in databases kept by journalist and media associations, as well as by the Standing Working Group for the Safety of Journalists, a pioneering approach taken in 2017, comprising prosecution, police and journalists’ representatives. However, reflecting the gravity of the situation, in 2025 all associations (Independent Journalists' Association of Serbia (NUNS), Journalists' Association of Serbia (UNS), Independent Journalists' Association of Vojvodina (NDNV), Association of Media Outlets (AM), Association of Independent Electronic Media (ANEM) and Association of Online Media (AOM) withdrew from the body citing institutional inefficiency and police inaction. ANEM emphasized that failure to investigate or prosecute even high-profile assaults sends a dangerous message of tolerance for violence. Journalists’ associations documented 184 attacks in 2023 and 166 in 2024. Serbia’s poor rankings in the WJS Global Index on Journalists’ Safety reflect not isolated incidents, but a pattern of impunity, intimidation, and institutional failure.
This radar chart displays how the country performs across all four safety dimensions, revealing areas of strength and concern.
This comparison highlights differences in safety experiences between male and female journalists, revealing potential gender-based disparities.
The physical dimension carries 50% weight in the safety index. Read the methodology in full.
This figure represents the total number of journalist killings in Serbia between 2016 and 2024.
Data sourced from UNESCO Observatory of Killed Journalists.
Note: This indicator carries 35% of the weight within the physical dimension of the Safety Index, making it the most significant factor in this category.
The psychological dimension carries 25% weight in the safety index. Read the methodology in full.
The digital dimension carries 12.5% weight in the safety index. Read the methodology in full.
The financial dimension carries 12.5% weight in the safety index. Read the methodology in full.
This section contains demographic information about survey respondents from Serbia.
Demographic information about survey respondents will be available in a future update.